Some weeks ago I had this dream related to subsequent visions which will follow. I've put this thread in the philosophy section as it perhaps raises debate as to what dreams and visions are. It will take me a long time to write and I will let you know when it is finished:

I was asleep. Jesus told me to go to a church. That surprised me. I wasn't surprised to see him and get an instruction from him, as that was usual for me. I was surprised that he had told me to go to a church. I woke up and got up, aware of the dream I had just had. Jesus pointed out to me I was still laying in my bed and I was asleep in this one though I would think I had been awake when I remembered, before I would remember he had told me I had been asleep. I was to write this as a vision in a vision section along with the visions while awake and walking in the street that would follow so people could see visions were just the same as dreams.
I was to write this dream in a vision thread on Bestukforums. This dream would be followed by several subsequent visions, this dream would be the opening post and would then be followed by the visions. There would be 4 subsequent visions. I would have 2 while walking in the street, different streets, one would be while I was walking on Morning Lane. There would be one vision while I was at home reading the bible as Peter had told me. Jesus pointed out there would be 5 visions as I would have another smaller one from him and he wanted me to put that in.
I would forget that I was to write the vision thread on Bestukforums and I would write them on The Sun forum. Toward the end of writing them I would encounter technical difficulties while trying to post, I would write long posts and be unable to post them, and I would remember I was to put them on Bestukforums. It was better that they were on Bestukforums as they did not disappear so quickly, and it was not good to have my visions keeping popping up on the News section of The Sun forum. They would be on a thread called 'Is Tony Blair In Revelation?' which was worthy of the news section, but the thread would turn into visions from me. Jesus pointed out I should have put the visions in the Lifestyle section. The Sun agreed. However, Bestukforums was the best place for them as then they would not disappear so quickly, so people would be able to read them for a long time. It was good I had first written them on The Sun as I could use them as templates for better more accurate drafts on the Bestukforum. As I had started writing them on The Sun, when I had finished writing them on Bestukforums, I could put on the thread in The Sun the link to the thread on Bestukforums for if they wanted to read them.
Jesus told me the people in the church I was to go to belonged to him. That surprised me. Some of them belonged to him. Jusus told me that many of them belonged to him. 'Some of them belonged to him' came from me, 'many of them' came from him. I knew I was not to be militant when I was in the church. Jesus told me to be gentle with them.
I was not to mention to people in the church about the gospel of Mark having 666 verses, until later, but to explain, when appropriate, that I believed the resurrection of Jesus was written in John, and mention the synoptic problem, that Matthew, Mark and Luke were 3 copies from an original, with different endings and beginings but the same source imbetween. I was to focus on the resurrection of Jesus being written in John. I was to accentuate the positive.
The woman who hypnotised me was pleased I was to focus on John. She did not think I should mention that Mark had 666 verses.
Jesus told me that there would be a woman who would invite me to a church soon, that was the church I was to go to and she was the woman for me. I thought Jesus was joking that she was the woman for me. He sometimes joked with me and I thought he was joking and using the woman as bait for me to get me into the church. Jesus said he wasn't joking and she was the woman for me.
If any woman in the church, who was not the one who had invited me, went after me I was to snub them. I was to be polite to them and talk to them but let them be in no doubt there was nothing doing romantically. I was to mention Christine in conversation with any woman who went after me. Christine was the dark haired woman who would invite me and I would remember her name had been in the dream later on, after she had invited me.
If the woman who invited me was not the woman for me, for example if I saw she had a boyfriend or it became apparent she was not interested in me, I was to leave the church and go to another church. It would be a woman who invited me to a church who was the correct woman for me. Jesus told me it would be the first woman, Christine - Jesus mentioned her name and I would remember that later on - at the first church who would be the correct woman for me.
Christine looked just like another woman known to me. Jesus said Christine was the other woman as she looked just like her, and she was the correct woman for me. Jesus was laughing and pointed out he had to find one who looked exactly the same as I was a stickler. Jesus told me Christine was the other one. It wasn't clear to me whether that meant Christine was the correct one, or the other one. I didn't think the other one was right for me. Then again, she had been programmed by me, the programming would come to the fore within a few years and the programming was good. Even so, I didn't think she was the right one for me. Jesus pointed out it was Christine who was the correct one as she was nice and the right one for me. It wasn't that Christine looked like the other one, it was the other on looked like Christine and I had fallen for her to bring me to Christine.
I realised Jesus was joking. Jesus sometimes played jokes on me about women. It was OK for Jesus to play jokes on me as I didn't mind and found them amusing.
Jesus told me he was not joking and there was a woman in the church for me and her name was Christine and she was the woman who would invite me. He told me that he did not mean it romantically, he meant she was a good woman for me to talk to and that she would enjoy talking to me. He told me that he did not mean it romantic but that whether it was romantic was up to me and Christine and that he was keeping out of that issue and leaving it up to me and Christine.
I wondered about the bit where I would leave the church if it became apparent she was not the woman for me, like if she had a boyfriend or was not interested in me. Jesus pointed out that that came from me and that Christine was a good woman for me and that did not mean romantic but that she was a good woman for me and would enjoy speaking with me.
Jesus told me it was OK to go to a church primarily for a woman and to go to the church as well. Jesus pointed out people should be OK with that, particularly as the instruction to me had come from him.

Sometime later I started a thread on The Sun forum called 'Is Tony Blair In Revelation?'. On the thread I had written the following passages from Revelation and the wikipedia link:

A great and wonderous sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth. Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on his heads. His tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth. The dragon stood in front of the woman who was about to give birth, so that he might devour had child the moment it was born. She gave birth to a son, a male child, who will rule all the nations with an iron sceptre. And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne. The woman fled into the desert to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1260 days.

(Revelation 12:1-6)

And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. He had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on his horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.

(Revelation 13:1)

"The beast, which you saw, once was, now is not, and will come up out of the Abyss and go to his destruction. The inhabitants of the earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the creation of the world will be astonished when they see the beast, because he once was, now is not, and yet will come.
"This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits. They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come he must remain for a little while. The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction."

(Revelation 17:8-11)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_hills_of_Rome

On the subsequent Tuesday evening, which I think was 2 weeks ago, I had this vision:

I was considering:

They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for a little while. (Revelation 17:10)

There were 5 rulers who had fallen, Marcus Aurelius was the 5th of them. That Marcus Aurelius was the 5th to have fallen indicated when Revelation was written. From when Revelation was written there were 5 subsequent rulers. The 'one is' could be moved along to the first. There were more than 5 but if you counted the ones who were in power for a reasonable length of time, there were 5.
Jesus told me I was wrong and that Revelation was written in 34 AD. What Jesus told me was light but the rest of the vision was dark. That the rest of the vision was dark was the rest of the vision was dark for me. The whole vision was good, Jesus agreed, but it was dark for me. What Jesus told me was good and was light. Jesus told me the vision would be light and good for me when I wrote it and I was to write it for people to read. The vision was dark for me if I didn't write it and there were things in the vision that were dark for me.
The reason that Marcus Aurelius was the 5th who had fallen in the vision was to show me Marcus Aurelius had been slain by me. The vision was darker here than when Jesus spoke to me, but it was not dark, there was still light to see. Jesus was still with me and he nodded that the reason Marcus Aurelius was the 5th king in the vision was to show me Marcus Aurelius had been slain by me. Jesus told me Marcus Aurelius was the 5th king and he had been slain by me. Jesus told people other than me that Marcus Aurelius had been slain by me.
I considered Marcus Aurelius was actually slain by Jesus. There was the 666 and things that were planned and prepared by God and had nothing to do with me, but Jesus did slay Marcus Aurelius through me. Jesus was being modest in saying Marcus Aurelius had been slain by me.
The 'one is', after the five had fallen, was me. I was the 'one is' after Marcus Aurelius because he had been slain by me. Marcus Aurelius had been the king all along until he was slain by me. There were kings after Marcus Aurelius had died but they were under him, what Marcus Aurelius did that was in the bible carried on and he was the king until he was slain.
I was a king but a different type, not the worldly type like a king of the earth. I was the type like in the dream, the type who's only duty was to fight any Nazi threat to his investiture. I was to write that dream in Share Your Dreams.
'One is' indicated he survived, as 'One is' remained 'One is' in the Word of God in the bible. That writing would not change. 'One is' was with the beast as I was in Babylon as I was in the EU.
Jesus pointed out to people other than me that 'One is' is me, and that the 5th of the fallen was Marcus Aurelius and that Marcus Aurelius had been slain by me. Jesus pointed out that he was also 'One is', as he was with me and in 'One is' with me and we were in the beast as we were in an EU country.
Jesus confirmed to me that the beast was the EU. He told me the beast was the Roman Empire and the Roman Empire was the EU. This was news to me. I had not realised the beast was the EU, I thought it was just the Roman Empire. I thought the image of the beast was the end of Mark, and Mark - the young man at the tomb, the Mark being the image of Marcus Aurelius as Mark bearing his name was a joke from him or on behalf of him, I thought by him. Mark ended at 16:8, most bibles pointed that out and it was obvious from reading. Mark 16:9-20 was Eleuthrius smoothing over. As Mark ended at 16:8, the only possible witness was the young man who was Mark. The young man Mark was also at Mark 14:51.
Jesus agreed with me and told me that was a little image of the beast. I was surprised as I thought that was the most important as it was about the resurrection, the resurrection was the most important and Mark attacked and obscured the resurrection. Jesus agreed that it was the most important issue and that he was grateful to me but he pointed out that was the main 666 wheras the EU was the main image. Jesus told me the EU was the main image of the beast which had been set up by the false prophet in honour of the Roman Empire, and was the Roman Empire. Jesus pointed out to me there were people who knew more than me. It was on the issue of the EU in Revelation, and some other things in revelation that there were people who knew more than me. On the issue of the 666, the one who knew most was me. Most people thought it was silicon chips they would put in people's heads and hands. I didn't disagree and thought it possible that the 666 could have a double meaning. I thought it was possible that after war in heaven - the bible - where the 666 was then the 666 could come down to earth with silicon chips. I thought the British ID cards was the 666 in the hand. Or I thought it possible the 666 silicon chips would not happen provided the 666 was defeated in the bible. I thought that was the likely one - that if the 666 was defeated in the bible there would not be the silicon chips in peoples heads or hands as if the 666 was defeated in the bible the governments would not try to bring back 666 again with silicon chips in peoples heads or hands, but if the 666 was left in the bible there would be 666 silicon chips in peoples heads or hands.
There were a lot of things in Revelation that were not known by me. There were big areas of Revelation that were not understood by me. Jesus pointed out that there were some areas of Revelation not understood by me that were understood by other people and I should read what people have to say about those areas. I would find out whether or not they were correct as Jesus would give vision to me regarding what they had to say. Jesus would not give me vision directly regarding some parts of Revelation as it was not all to be understood and revealed by me or I would get conceited. Other people were to reveal some too so it wasn't all done by me. I was pleased the 666 had been revealed by me as that was the top one everone wanted to reveal. Again Jesus pointed out to me there were some people who knew more than me. Jesus was trying to bring me down to earth and stop me becoming conceited. There were wide areas of knowledge where people knew more than me, I tended to focus strongly on one issue. It was wide areas of knowledge Jesus was pointing out people knew more than me. Jesus pointed out there were people who knew more than me.
Tony Blair was the false prophet in Revelation 13 as the EU had been set up for him. Politicians were false prophets and Tony Blair was a top false prophet. Politicians were always going on about their visions when they had seen nothing. That was a mark of a false prophet. Politicians also talked about their dreams. They were not real dreams but were merely what they imagined. Calling what you imagined or hoped 'dreams' was another mark of a false prophet. Martin Luther King did that but he was acceptable, he'd be let off on that but he was the only one let off. The EU had been set up by Tony Blair for Tony Blair. There were others in the false prophet as others had also helped set up the EU for Tony Blair and Tony Blair had helped set up the EU for himself.


(will continue)

(continued)

Some people thought the false prophet was me. There was nothing false about me. It was possible I was insane but I wasn't false. I was either insane or a prophet, or a combination of insane and prophet.
Jesus told me he was against the EU as the Roman Empire was really bad - her sins are piled up to heaven and God has remembered her crimes. (Jesus paralleled that sentence as it ran by me but he said 'its sins are piled up to heaven and God has remembered its crimes' as, in the parallel sentence by me, 'her' was used by me. I thought I should go with 'its' as used by Jesus. Jesus told me to go with 'her'.) That was using a sentence from Revelation 17 about the prostitute. I thought the prostitute that sat on the beast was the church. Jesus pointed out that the church had been taken over by the Roman Empire and that the prostitute was in the Roman Empire and was the Roman Empire. God didn't like the Roman Empire.
Jesus pointed out the EU was for the politicians, was a gravy train, and they were ripping off me. They were ripping me off by taking a lot of money off other people which meant I made less. I was aware the doctors were doing the same. Jesus was with me on that and pointed out to people that the doctors were ripping off me.
It wasn't just me who was being ripped off. It seemed selfish that being highlighted was me. Jesus pointed out that other people were being ripped off but a good example was me as when people were feeling the pinch a first casualty was me. Some buskers were licenced, they were immoral and threw their mates off the pitches and had the best pitches sown up and could play on the best pitches for a long time. People feeling the pinch didn't effect them. Their money went down but they still had plenty as they were playing for long times on the best pitches. Some of the licenced buskers were also on the dole. It was classified as self employed but they got their benefits and in reality were on the dole. They didn't have to sign on. They were flying off to Corfu, Brazil and the Canary Isles. They were like politicians on the take. They were like Jacqui.
I busked unofficial which meant it was difficult for me to get pitches, I usually had to play on cr*p pitches. They were OK for me. The licences buskers played for more hours than me and on better pitches than me and I wasn't on the dole. Jesus prefered me. He liked that I busked unofficial and didn't throw my mates off the pitches and that I wasn't on the dole.
Some of the official buskers on the dole flying around the world were nice people. Some of the politicians on the take were nice people. Some of the politicians on the take were congenial nice people if you met them in person.
Some people thought the official buskers were moral because they sooked up to authority. They thought the unlicenced buskers were immoral because they were going against authority. Sooking up to authority had nothing to do with being moral. Being moral was doing the correct thing in the circumstance.
The churches thought the official buskers were moral because they were with authority and the unlicenced buskers were immoral. The churches were with the official buskers. Jesus supported unofficial busking. Jesus was with me. Jesus thought unofficial busking was fairer because it included everyone including the poor ones who were outside. Official control meant exclusion. Jesus said that a good point of the official system was it allowed people to busk who had previously been afraid to busk, and he pointed out that the reason they had previously been afraid to busk was the police. Jesus thought the answer was to have busking unofficial but accepted and for the police to leave them alone.
Most people were like politicians on the take and official buskers on the dole given the opportunity. There were a few people who were not but most people were like them. Rather than condemning them for doing what most people would do given the opportunity, it was best to take the opportunity away. That was why some people thought anarchy was the best way as it took the opportunity away as officialdom enconsed unfairness, thus making it more widespread. Some people thought the opposite and that more legislation and government control was needed to make things fairer. That was a debate I wasn't getting into now but I tended towards the anarchy as being fairer. Taking the busking as an example, when it was anarchy it was much fairer as most people shared. There were a few who were greedy but most were fair. Most people were sheep and they copied people like me who they saw being fair rather than the people being greedy. When busking became official, people who were previously fair went over to the greedy and the selfishness that previously had few adherants became the norm.
The unofficial busking was fair. There were lists and in most stations it was fair except for a problem caused by the police. The police caused a problem. What would happen was there would be a list and the police would move a busker on. Another busker would come and a sew list would start with different buskers booking on with the new busker. Therefor there were 2 lists with different people on which was a problem. That was a problem caused by the police.
There were people on the dole who had recently lost their job and who played guitar and were in heavy debt. Some of them had families and their dole didn't cover the debt and if they didn't pay off some debt the bailiffs would come. I thought they should go busking and they should be able to busk immediately. The RMT didn't let them. There was no Solidarity from the RMT. There were a lot of people who had lost their jobs in the recession, some of them were musicians. They deserved to busk more than self empoyed people on the dole flying around the world.
There were hippies travelling around who should be allowed to busk in The Underground. That travelling hippies should be able to play was important to me. Whether or not they were signing on didn't bother me. I wasn't bothered by someone signing on doing some busking. I wasn't into people on the dole hogging the best pitches for 6 hours every day which was what was happening with some of the official buskers. They were greedy b*stards.
The official system had a de facto ban on homeless people busking. It was not an official ban but it was a de facto one. There were homeless buskers sleeping and playing outside who were better musicians than many of the official buskers in The Underground. There were homeless buskers playing outside in January who would quite like to play in The Underground. The official buskers weren't bothered about them.
Some people thought the answer was to alter the official system to make it more fair. I disagreed and believed it would be more fair without official control. There would be a few who would be greedy but overall it would be more fair as most people would copy me and people like me and share.
I was aware there were some examples people could make for government control. The busking however was an example of something better without government control. I thought it would be reasonable and more fair for the Underground to say, "These are the pitches," and leave it alone other than where there was a specific problem like someone being too loud for a specific pitch, in which case they could have a chat and explain and point out a suitable pitch. That would mean anyone could play. Unfortunatly the buskers had become a de facto Trade Union, it was socialism, and now wouldn't accept that. I didn't like socialism. I liked anarchism. That was not Nitsch. A lot of people thought Nitsch was anarchism but it wasn't. Not unless someone had misrepresented Nitsch to me.
Jesus pointed out that someone had misrepresented Nitsch to me. Jesus was not endorsing him and pointed out he was not endorsing him, he just said someone had misrepresented him to me.
That the official buskers were a Socialist de facto Trade Union wasn't a point against socialism or Trade Unions in general. This vision was apolitical. I wasn't apolitical but the vision was. Any political system could be good or bad. You could have bad socialism and good socialism, bad capitalism and good capitalism, good anarchism and bad anarchism. It depended on the people. I wasn't sure you could have bad anarchism. I thought bad anarchism was not anarchism.
When the Socialist buskers went to Spain or another country, they expected to busk and expected other buskers to book them on. They were in favour of anarchy when abroad. When a Spanish busker came to London, the Socialist buskers didn't want him or her to be allowed to busk.
The Socialist RMT didn't want homeless people busking. They let homeless people walk through the station. I didn't understand why they didn't want homeless people busking. The RMT didn't want people busking unless they had all the details about them, with proof of names and address and criminal record checks. I didn't understand. They let people walk through the station without knowing all the details about them, I could see no logical reason why they needed all the details of someone playing a musical instrument. The RMT said a busker might attack someone so they needed all the details. A passenger walking through the station might attack someone. A Station Guard might attack someone. Did the RMT want silicon chips in the heads of every passenger passing through the station so they could control everything? They probably did.
For the RMT regarding busking it was all about control. There was no reason for the control other than to control. The urge to control was a bad human trait and the RMT needed to examine that.
A few of the RMT members were sound and did give Solidarity. There were a few of them who in 20 years had never moved me. Some people thought they were timid. They were not timid, they were not afraid to stand up to the bosses. There was a really good one who never moved buskers on principle who was still working on the platforms, I thought he should have been promoted.
Many of the RMT were OK and left me to play, there were a few RMT who were top who in 20 years would not move buskers come what may.
Anyone investigating the official buskers would be assured by LU that the buskers on the dole were only doing 4 hours a day. That was because buskers on the dole were careful not to book too many pitches incase anyone checked with LU. The bookings done by LU were not the same as the reality of who was doing the pitches. Some of the buskers who were not on the dole booked extra pitches to give to the ones on the dole. The official buskers had a website run by them and only from them on which people could cancel the pitches for the ones on the dole. To see what was going on, you had to look at the lists of who was actually signing in at the stations and playing the pitches, rather than who phoned up to book with LU. Aside from being given pitches by people not on the dole, official buskers on the dole went round looking for empty pitches they hadn't booked and took them off me. They signed in to the station when they took them off me.
I wondered if it was true that buskers not on the dole were booking extra pitches to give to buskers on benefits who were wary of booking too many. That was not known to me but came from me in the vision. It was correct that it was going on. There was the private official buskers website where that went on and it also happened aside from that between friends. I saw next to me the guy who ran the official buskers private website, who was not on the dole, he sometimes booked extra pitches and gave them to ones on the dole. He was standing next to me and he confirmed to me that he did sometimes book pitches and give them to them. That was nice of him. It wasn't nice for me or others as they took those pitches from me and others. The official buskers didn't let me on that site to check for cancellations.
It was argued that if anyone could busk there would not be enough pitches for everyone. That was rubbish, there would not be enough pitches for official buskers on benefits to hog for 6 - 8 hours every day, but if you got rid of them there were enough pitches for everyone.
4 hours a day on those pitches would be plenty for me without the dole. There was no excuse for anyone on the licenced busking scheme receiving benefits. That was unless they had a large house to rent and a few children. There were single male buskers on the dole known to me who were constantly flying off on holiday. The only valid non fraudulent reason for single official buskers being on the dole was they were sh*t at music.
Some of the official buskers were not on the dole. Some of the official buskers agreed with me. Some of the official buskers agreed with me not just about the official buskers on the dole hogging the pitches but about the official busking scheme in general.
It was safe to assume that no-one doing the licenced busking as a living was earning less than £200 a week. That would be what the lowest earners among them got. It was safe to assume that any regular licenced busker who claimed to be earning less that £200 a week was a liar.
An official busker on the dole known to me told me not to write the section of the busking but to leave that bit out. He pointed out it could cause trouble for him and trouble for me as I sometimes flypitched official pitches and the official buskers would turn on me.
I disagreed, I thought it should go in. I was aware it was likely an official busker would read it. Once one had read it they had all read it. It didn't bother me. I'd continue to be polite and friendly to everyone. If any of them got heavy with me they would run to tell the teacher.
It was strange the delay while Jesus considered it. I wondered if that was symbolic to me. It could be telling me to wait before writing it. Jesus nodded to me when I was writing the vision I was to add it in later and not put it in straight away or it would cause a problem for me. He told me I was to add it in to the writing of the vision after I had written Joel 2:28.
I was worried as I had written in the vision about the busking on Bestukforums before I had written Joel 2:28, which was written out later in the vision. Jesus told me to write Joel 2:28. He told me people were reading the vision and were getting the wrong impression so I was to write Joel 2:28 on straight away and it would be OK. I noticed I was walking west along Oxford Street just past Bond Street. I had not known where I was as I was away but I now saw where I was. As I walked I was aware that bit about the writing of the vision, with Jesus telling me to write Joel 2:28, would seem to people - the woman who hypnotised me, she believed me - like it was seen in a vision by me at around the time of writing. Others - Scorpio - would think it was made up by me. I liked the woman who had hypnotosed me as she believed me. I didn't like what she had done, but I liked that she believed me. I liked Scorpio even though she didn't believe me. It was normal for someone to be sceptical of me initially, Scorpio would believe me later on. There was something I would write and add on later that would cause Scorpio to believe it was a vision. I was glad Scorpio was still on Bestukforums. I hadn't had a look on there recently but she was still on.
The woman who hypnotised me thought this and other bits of the vision were later visions that I was receiving and adding in to the writing as I saw them. That was partially true, Jesus had explained to me that it was all in the vision at the time but as it was not recalled to me until later, it even seemed to me that it was received later. Jesus assured me it was in the original vision, it just wasn't possible to remember everything all at the same time so it was recalled in time release to me. I examined carefully what was in the vision, and other visions and dreams, and when it took place and it appeared to me from my own observation that what Jesus told me was true. That was not that I disbelieved him, it was that my observation agreed with him.
In reality it and this was in the vision weeks before at the time I had the vision as I was walking along Oxford Street.
Jesus wondered whether I should write that section. He thought about it for a moment, taking his time, which was unusual. He was weighing up whether it would cause a problem for me. Jesus told me to put it in as they deserved it and it wouldn't cause a problem for me.
Jesus wanted the UK and the other nations to pull out of the EU. Jesus said the EEC was good and the EU was bad and we should go back to the EEC.
I wasn't in the EU now as I had now realised what the EU was and wanted out. If you wanted out of the EU you were not in the EU, if you were in favour of the EU you were in the beast.
When I was around 20 and taking loads of LSD I was heavily in Babylon. LSD was Babylon. It came from the authorities, the CIA distributed it and it was made by scientists. The usage of Babylon for LSD was in the loose sence. Some people used Babylon in a loose sence as a generalised term for currupt authority so it could also apply to the CIA and people could call the CIA Babylon. Babylon was the Catholic Church but it was also the Protestant Church and other churches. Jesus approved of Babylon being used in the loose sence as corrupt authority and that it should apply to the CIA. Jesus didn't like people thinking Babylon was only the Catholic Church and prefered its loose usage. I was aware the doctors were Babylon. I had recollection of telling the woman who hypnotised me that she was Babylon. I had recollection of telling her that she was the main Babylon, that she in person was Babylon, the epitome of Babylon and the main Babylon in the prophecy, Babylon was her in the same way the beast was epitomised in the eighth king. I recalled telling her -

MYSTERY
BABYLON THE GREAT
THE MOTHER OF PROSTITUTES
AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF
THE EARTH

- and explaining to her it was her in person. The prophecy about the merchants of the sea and so on mourning because nobody buys their cargoes anymore was figurative and refering to her. As it was about her, Revelation 18 was quite witty.
The reason she was the main Babylon was she had hypnotised me. I was the prophet and she had tried to kill me. There were other prophets besides me but I was a main one. I had dreamed I was the 2 prophets of Revelation 11. Some people thought I was one of them. It made no difference whether there were 1 or 2 or more because The Spirit was the same in all the prophets. That was not the human spirit but was the Spirit. Those 2 refered to Elijah and Moses and people erroniously expected them to do the same, shut up the sky and strike the earth with plagues. Those 2 would not do the same, it was just identifying them as the Spirit was the same. People who thought they were those 2 went to Jerusalem to die. The death of those 2 refered to Peter and Paul who were killed in Rome. Jesus was also killed in Rome as Jerusalem was under the authority of Rome. Peter and Paul were those 2. Some people thought 1 was John. It was John as the Spirit was the same but regarding the deaths it refered to Peter and Paul. John agreed with me that it was Peter and Paul. John had lived on after Peter and Paul. John had not seen death before he saw the Son of Man coming in his kingdom. John saw the Son of Man coming in his kingdom in Revelation and he lived on. John was not the only one as Jesus had said, "I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."
What took place in the nurse's room was the major battle involving me. That was where she met her doom. She met her doom when she hypnotised me.
She didn't like the bit in Revelation 17 about her riding on the beast, holding a cup filled with abonimable things and the filth of her adulteries. She thought it made her sound like an adulteress.
I had recollection of telling her, while I was under hypnosis, that she had had an affair with one of her colleagues, and told her the name of him, told her to write it down and tell her colleagues what I had said, and I told her we would not continue until she wrote it down. Jesus was speaking through me under hypnosis.
I had recollection of being aware of her having had a few affairs, while under hypnosis. Jesus, now, told me that she had had a few affairs. The awareness of her affairs while under hypnosis was also Jesus telling me. The important affair to me was the one she had with her colluegue who's name I recalled. Although I recalled his name and his name was known to me, I was not to write his name down.
Some people thought, similar to her prostitution, that her hypnotising people for MI5 while working for the NHS was enough in itself to account for Revelation calling her an adulteress. I agreed that did make her an adulteress, but, that aside, she was an adulteress.
Jesus told me I had said to her about her affair and told her to write it down, and he told me that he had said it through me. I had parallel memories of being under hypnosis and wasn't sure what I had said and what I had not. Jesus told me I had told her about her affair and refused to continue unless she wrote it down. Jesus told me to make sure to write that down. It was in the vision so I thought I would write it down, though I was aware that in a long vision some could get ommitted or I might get bored with writing it and stop writing, and so I could easily inadverantly omit it. That I might get bored with it and stop writing was what people thought of me. It was what the woman who hypnotised me thought of me. I sometimes thought it of me. Jesus pointed out it wasn't the case and that I was OK, and that he sometimes overburdened me by giving me another vision when I hadn't yet finished writing one to point out they should give money to me to write them, and that he gave the visions to me to write because I was OK, the reason I often didn't finish writing dreams and visions was I didn't have time. It was literally not possible for me. If I spent more time writing, that was less time busking which meant I had no food or would have to go and sleep outside. Or it was less time playing and writing songs on my keyboard and Jesus wanted me to do that. Jesus nodded that he wanted me to do that and pointed out I was good at that. Jesus pointed out to people, and me, that my track 'The Dreams' was a good one.
Jesus thought the NHS should give me money to enable me to play my keyboards and write the visions. Jesus thought they should give me £10 000 for hypnotising me. Jesus pointed out that £10 000 would be a way of apologising to me and would enable me to play my keyboard and write the visions. The woman who hypnotised me agreed they should give me £10 000. She agreed the NHS should give me £10 000, mainly because she wanted to agree with Jesus. Some people thought she should give me £10 000. I thought she should give me £10 000. Jesus agreed with me. That she should give me £10 000 was red hot and dangerous for me. Each sentence, including that Jesus agreed with me, about that she should give me £10 000 was glowing red hot. Jesus saying the NHS should give me £10 000 was clear. That the NHS should give me £10 000 was correct. She also thought the NHS should compensate me but she thought the NHS should give me £10 000 because Jesus said that.
Jesus pointed out to people the NHS should give me £10 000 without me asking. I was aware I wouldn't ask for £10 000, and Jesus pointed out to people that it was correct that I wouldn't ask.
Dr Grun thought the NHS should give me £10 000 for what happened to me. I was to write Dr Grun's name. I was to write to her. I had been told by the young doctor a week before I was hypnotised to write to Dr Grun. She might not have said that to me but it was received psychicaly by me. I was in a vision state when I was with the young doctor. I was in a vision state before than, I was in a vision state when I walked in to the surgery. As I walked through the door, there were 2 people in the waiting room, one of whom I knew, the other of whom was in a blur. The rest of the room was clear and only he was in a blur and I was aware at the time that he was being obscured from me. I was aware at the time that there may be many people in the waiting room where I could see empty chairs. I was aware that the 2 I could see may not be there and the entire reality could have changed for me.
I didn't know what had happened. I didn't know if the 2 people were there, if it was a vision at the time, or if the correct memory had wiped clean and replaced by the hypnotism. I was quite interested in what had happened there. I wondered if Dr Grun would tell me. I was only interested in conversing with Dr Grun. Treatment was out of the question and if I could not converse without treatment there would be no conversation. I would need a guarantee that I had sovereignty over me or I wouldn't go near the doctors. I knew legally they had no power over me if I didn't see them as to section you they had to have seen you. I figured that, illegally, the NHS wanted to section me. It was illegal because I was no danger to myself, anybody else, and was capable of looking after myself. They wanted to section me because of what I said. That was illegal but they had no police to moniter them and me being sectioned was what a section of them wanted. I thought it was best to stay away from the NHS.
Jesus thought Dr Grun should just tell me roughly what happened, like whether I was hypnotised, whether there was an incident in the waiting room, whether it was short or 20 minutes long. I would be able to work out what happened from little information. Jesus said they should admit I was hypnotised, that there was no need to give me the transcript of what happened under hypnosis and they should give me £10 000.
I disagreed with that. I wasn't interested in the money, I was interested in a transcript of the hypnotism. I was aware the NHS could alter it and give me a false copy. That was what I expected, it was what officials were like. If I said a sentence that was good for me, they would write half the sentence which was bad for me. The Social Services were dab hands at that. The woman at CAFCAS was into that. She was an evil bitch. She agreed. I accompanied someone to a meeting and if there was a tape of the meeting which was compared to her account of it and reasonable people knew of it, she would be fired on the spot. The NHS would do that with the hypnotism of me as it was what officials did.
I was hoping there was a recording of the hypnotism of me. I was hoping that GCHQ may have been able to get hold of the recording via my mobile phone and pass it on to a different part of the NHS, as I thought that was something they were able to do, particularly as I thought they had at times been listening to me and any conversation I had near my mobile phone would be stored. I didn't think that listening to people's conversations via mobile phones was something they should do, but as it was something they did, in this instance it could be useful. It was possible she took my mobile phone off me. I had recollection of her taking my mobile phone off me, and me conning her to leave it on, for the recording, as I assured her that nobody would phone me at 9.30am. That was a recollection I had of while under hypnotism but I didn't know whether the recollection was true or whether it came from me.
Jesus told me there was no need for me to have a transcript as what happened in the room was OK for me but embarassing for them. Jesus told me I told her to f*ck off, called her ugly and gave her a load of abuse and that it was OK for me but embarassing for them. That I believed it was OK for me and embarassing for them was why I wanted the transcript.
I had recollection telling her to f*ck off, calling her ugly and giving her loads of abuse, but I had recollection of other stuff, I recalled explaining to her what I had seen the social sevices do. I wanted a transcript.
I wondered what had happened in the nurses room as I had parallel memories. They seemed parallel to me. Private Eye thought it was linear. Jesus told me it was linear and told me to go through it in a line. He told me that if I went through it linear I would be able to work out what happened. He told me I would have to focus on the beginning, he told me there were 3 beginnings, that made sence to me, and that I had to concentrate on which beginning came first as that beginning was the correct line. He told it was difficult for me to work out which beginning came first but that it was something I could do if I concentrated on it. I thought the 1st beginning was the MI5 agent who spoke of me shattering MI5 agents minds, told me she would not shatter my mind but later changed her mind. Jesus agreed that was the correct line. He told me there was another correct line that was later and which went with that, that was the line where she was the nice one after she had programmed to kill me.
Jesus told me it was Free Association. That was Freud. I hadn't read about Free Association, I had seen it in print but hadn't had a good look, but I knew of it and knew she had done that. I was aware she had done Freud on me. I was aware there were a lot of people who had been killed by Freud. It made sence to me that there was Free Association. She had used it as a weapon on me. I recalled her cheerfully telling me, "Well James, you're going on a ride you're never coming back from," as she used Free Association on me, telling me to go this way and that. She used it as a cover incase I recalled the hypnotism and the pendulum didn't kill me. She, in the line of the shattering MI5 agents minds, told me to recall a separate hypnotism and left it up to me. She also told me to recall a wild event the week before, and left it up to me. I also had recollection of her asking me what had happened last week, at the beginning, in a manner that it had happened. I didn't know whether that had happened or whether it was Free Association, I had recollection of it being both.
The parallel memory and contradicting memories for everything didn't bother me. There was no chance of that killing me. It was the pendulum con that bothered me. She seemed to think that parallel memories could shatter people's minds. She did the parallel memories in conjunction with the pendulum con to shatter my mind and to discredit me with contradicting recollection if it went wrong. I had previously written on The Sun that you could give me 100 parallel memories and it wouldn't bother me. I had meant that genuine. Jesus pointed out to people that 100 parallel memories would bother me and that I could handle 10.
I had focused on trying to get the hypnotism linear and it fitted linear except for the end. I had recollection of walking out the room and she was terrified of me and sh*tting herself, and I had recollection of walking out the room and she was happy and pleased with me. That did fit linear as there was an explanation for that. Just before I got up I had recollection of her telling me that she was shocked by me and that she didn't want me to see that or I would realise I had been hypnotised, she told me to see her happy and that everything was fine. At the time I decided to accept that one, and to walk out the room, as otherwise I would be really angry and there would be a mess that wouldn't go well for me wheras I was aware when I attacked them later for hypnotising me, things would go well for me.
I also had a recollection of me getting and walking out of the room without her waking me. I also had recollection of her waking me. I would have to examine that. I didn't have recollection of her waking me. I had recollection of her preparing to wake me and I got up and walked out without her waking me. That was the one where she was afraid of me. I had told her that if I wanted to I could get up and kill her without her waking me. In the happy recollection of leaving the room she had woken me. I would have to examine that. I had no recollection of that. The happy walking out had been programmed. That had been explained. I did have recollection of her waking me but it wasn't the in the happy line as that was programmed.
The ending was a simple part but even that was complicated.
I didn't have parallel memories of the beginning. There were different beginnings but they took place at different times. There was a long beginning where she was MI5 and I told her a long story about a terrorist organisation I was a member of called Hawklords 2 which had infiltrated MI5 and the Lib Dems. This was before I knew there was a band called Hawklords 2 and was after she had asked me if I was sitting comfortably. There was no introduction with grains of sand on this one. At the time I knew about Hawklords but I didn't know about Hawklords 2. That was on mach 3 that I told her about Hawklords 2. I told her it was an anarchist terrorist organisation run by Harvey Bainbridge and had around 150 members, all of whom were unofficial fully trained hypnotists. I told her that 150 was an estimate from me and that I did not know how many there were as the organisation was run on a need to know basis and only Harvey would know. I told her I was a top member in the organisation but there was stuff going on that was unknown to me. I told her that I had been trained in hypnosis by Harvey in the late 80s. Hawklords 2 were inductive hypnotists, there was a lot about inductive hypnotists spoken by me. I didn't know what inductive meant, I would have to check on it.
There were different speeds at which the pendulum went, the speeds were known as maches. The reason I told her a cock and bull story on mach 3 was she had not believed me on mach 2 when I told her the truth, and she had told me it was scientifically proven that it was impossible to lie on mach 3. On mach 2 she asked me to tell her something by which she would know whether I was telling the truth. "You're ugly," I told her truthfully and she didn't believe me so she put the pendulum to mach 3. Although 'it was scientifically proven that you cannot lie on mach 3' they put it at mach 2 with people who they believed to tell the truth at mach 2 because mach was was more comfortable. Mach 3 was comfortable to me.
I had meant she was spiritually ugly in hypnotising me. Having told me it was scientifically proven that it was impossible to lie on mach 3, she asked me to tell her a story. I told her I could not make up a story but I could tell her a story that was the truth, and I told her about Hawklords 2. I got the impression she believed me.
I hypnotised her while I was on mach 3. I did it using words from Freefall by the original Hawklords. I explained to her that the hypnotic words in it had been written by Harvey and Bob had added words on. I told her the hypnotism in it:

'Before you jump you wear the frown
Of someone who is stalling
Theres no up theres only down
The other side of falling
All you have to do is take one step into the sky'

I talked her through the words, "So you're on a plane and about to jump but you're a bit afraid and stalling. Theres no up theres only down, the other side of falling. Thats imaginative. You step out the plane and you go down, theres no up, only down. Now imagine the world is not there. You continue falling and when you come out where Australia would be you are going up. Thats the other side of falling. So you're standing on a plane about to jump and you're stalling. Then you step out of the plane and you're falling... falling... falling... falling... falling..."

At that point she was heavily hypnotised by me as I was under hypnosis. If that line had happened, I had sent her completely insane. She also told me stuff about MI5 under questioning by me. She subsequently tried to kill me on that line too. On that line she tried to kill and torture me by going up through the maches. That was intended by me as her pendulum only went up to mach 8 which was not enough to kill me.
That was a different beginning to the one where she complained about the MI5 agents who's minds I had shattered. I thought the one with the maches was from me and the one with the grains of sand and the MI5 agents was correct. Jesus agreed with me.
One of the first things she told me, after the, "There are many grains of sand on the sea but few rocks, you are one of the rocks James," bit, was, "I have to deal with the MI5 agents who's minds you have shattered." That sounded egotistical of me, if it was a recollection devised by me, but I wouldn't discount it and aware it was probably not a recollection devised by me. I had thought at the time that she was exagerating, that a few MI5 agents, or one, had encountered a problem after reading me. I noticed 'a few' was good quality, wheras 'or one' was poor quality and from me. It was possible that reading me caused MI5 agents, or one, to think about things which caused a problem with their employee. Again I noticed 'a few' was good quality wheras 'or one' was poor quality and from me. 'A few' was correct.
I thought it was possible that when MI5 agents started to run into problems due to thinking having read me, she shattered their minds and blamed it on me.
I was aware I had done a lot of messages from dreams and wrote from dreams and visions. The messages may have shattered MI5 agents minds. That was how it appeared to me. That was how it appeared to me on LOOT messageboard.
She told me that although I shattered MI5 agents minds she was not going to shatter my mind. She later changed her mind due to my attitude.
When she told me that she was not going to shatter my mind, she told me that she had power over me. I told her she had no power over me. I wasn't protesting or trying to counter her, I was just observing myself speaking and I was being matter of fact with her.
She had told me that MI5 agents had to read me and that I shattered their minds. I took that as on The Sun forum, Bestukforums and Postmaster and thought it was refering to dreams and visions. I explained to her that if I shattered MI5 agents minds it was inadvertant by me and that it was God shattering their minds through me. It was that I was unrepentant, passing it to God and telling her I would continue to write dreams and visions that caused her to decide to kill me.
She had tried to programme me not to write dreams and visions. She told me that I would not see visions any more and that I was not going to see Jesus again. I was aware of rebellion and that I was going to see lots of visions with Jesus in them. The rebellion was not just me, Jesus was with me at the time and told me he was going to give me loads of visions with him in them.
The 2 different beginnings in which she was an MI5 agent seemed parallel to me. I was aware it was linear because of what Jesus had told me. They seemed like 2 different beginnings both at the beginning. The one where she asked me if I was comfortable seemed false to me.
I had recollection of her giving me ECT. That was at the beginning. I thought that was at the beginning of the line where she subsequently asked me if I was comfortable, and with the maches. The ECT was very unpleasant, it felt like the life force being sucked out of my brain, but each time it came back on. I dodged the last one by deliberately going temporarily unconscious, as I was aware that was going to be really bad, and to fool her machine that she had sucked the life force out of me. I was aware I could fool their machinery. I had thought that ECT would be a big machine, but it was like she had a taser to the back of my head which she fired repeatedly.
The line with the maches went all the way through to when I got up. The line with the MI5 agents who's minds I had shattered, and no differring maches, went all the way through too.
The other beginning arrived later, after she had tried to kill me. That was on the MI5 agents who's minds I had shattered line. She was being nice to me. That wasn't a beginning as she told me, after she had programmed to kill me with the scrambled parallel memory and the pendulum set to go off on me, that now she had done that, was there anything I would like to tell her about what I thought was wrong with the world. She told me she would write it down. That was also a beginning as at some point she pretended, so it seemed to me, that the hypnotism had only just begun, and she feigned surprise that she had tried to kill me and denied it. It seemed to me that the surprise was feigned.
Going through it linear, she was coming at me from different angles to confuse me and to make a mess of me. One minute she was an MI5 agent trying to programme to kill me, the next minute she was a nice woman trying to help me with the Social Services, taking down what I was saying under hypnosis about them.
There was a beginning where she was nice and asked me what had happened with the Social Services. That was after she had asked me what had happened last week. Her asking me what had happened last week was on the line where she was MI5. There was a line where she asked me what had happened last week, and there was a line where she programmed me to falsly recall an event last week. It was very confusing for me. It seemed that for ever recollection, there was a contradicting one. I wondered if she had programmed that. For her to have programmed that and me to have taken it on, it must have been appealing to me, to make things more interesting for me.
Later on there was an area where she was Social Services and was the CAFCAS woman. I saw her as the CAFCAS woman. She was coniving and trying to discredit me with the hypnotism and trying to cover her tracks. At this point I also saw her as a friend of mine's mother when she was young. I realised that she was like the Social Services and was coniving and cunning when she was young. I was also aware that she had improved but that I was being shown she was like one of them when she was young.
I had refered to the woman who hypnotised me as being another track when I first wrote about the hypnotism on The Sun forum. That was incorrect, it was just an area quite late on in the hypnotism. I called that a track soon after the hypnotism hit me. It was very confusing for me, it wasn't a deliberate mistake. I saw things clearer from a distance.
Late on under the hypnotism the different tracks merged together and I was flitting between them. I was explaining to the woman that I had been giving her abuse on the other track. I had been dishing out severe abuse when she spoke and I suddenly realised she was nice, or she suddenly pretended to be nice and to be puzzled as to why I was giving her abuse, so I apologised and explained to her I was talking to the nasty her on the other track.
On the maches track, mach 7 was uncomfortable to me. She was going up through the maches to torture and try to kill me. In the same way as I dodged the ECT, I deliberately went unconscious. When I woke up I was aware the hypnotism had been infiltrated with dream. I went asleep on the other track too. I recalled waking up and telling her that I had fallen asleep as she had been wittering on and boring me, and that the hypnotism had been infiltrated with dream. Dream was the wild card. With me there was also vision and it was possible she had hypnotised me when I was in a vision state, or I had gone into a vision state under hypnotism.
There was a line where I told the woman who hypnotised me, quite late on, that by telling me not to write dreams and not to have visions and not to see Jesus, she was inadvertantly trying to kill me. She didn't realise she was trying to kill me but she was trying to kill me. Dreams and visions were important to me, they were survival for me, and by trying to take them away she was literally trying to kill me. Dreams and visions are Jesus. That was according to the bible - going by Joel 2:28 and when Jesus spoke of the Spirit in the gospel of John - and it was also according to me. I was in agreement with the bible. Perhaps the NHS and the woman who hypnotised me thought they were trying to save me from Jesus. I told her that as she had tried to kill me, I had therefor programmed myself so she had programmed to kill me with parallel memories and the pendulum, and that I would survive it, just, having gone right to the brink. I told her it would appear to people that she had tried to kill me, and that that was fair as she had tried to kill me.
It was nice of me to point that out. I couldn't say that that was what had happened but it was a recollection. I had contradicting recollections and could not say that that one was the correct one. I thought it might be the correct one. However, Jesus had said the she used Free Association on me. Her using Free Association on me contradicted that one. I thought it contradicted it as it had happened in Free Association. As Jesus had told me she used Free Association on me, that she used Free Association on me was the correct one.
Some people thought I shouldn't get £10 000 of the NHS as that was sponging. That was the wrong way round. It was them who were sponging off me. The psychologists were on over £100 000 a year and they were sponging off me, I was streets ahead of them and did what I did for free. They were sponging off me. The psychologists would read me later and would sponge off me. They were already reading me. A one off payment of £10 000 to me was modest in comparison to the psychologists getting over £100 000 every year, when I knew more than them and they were sponging off me. It was the psychiatrists. I didn't know the difference between psychologists and psychiatrists. That was something they knew more than me. I thought the psychiatrists dished out drugs. They were idiots. A lot of people with mental health problems had a problem with the liver which caused the mental health problems because the nutrients were not getting to the brain. The psychiatrists gave them drugs which further damaged the liver. They were total idiots.
Sometimes with psychiatric problems the liver was not damaged but was blocked. It was common with psychiatric problems that the liver was blocked. Milk Thistle was good for clearing blockage. Jesus agreed with me that Milk Thistle was good and cleared liver blockage. When the liver was damaged, Milk Thistle did not repair the liver. Some people thought it did. It didn't. However, it did clear blockage, and often when there was liver damage there was also liver blockage so Milk Thistle could help the mental health of people with liver damage by clearing the blockage. The doctors often didn't know the difference between liver damage and liver blockage, often what they thought was liver damage was actually blockage. Milk Thistle should be used widespread on psychiatric wards. If I were running the NHS there would be loads of Milk Thistle in psychiatric hospitals and it would also be given to people with mental health problems who were not in hospital.
In psychiatric hospitals they gave the patients drugs that damaged the liver to shut them up, to make life easy for the doctors. I understood that they sometimes needed to calm patients down but that could be done with Valerian and Devil's Claw, which did not damage the liver. Jesus pointed out that Devil's Claw was the good one. Jesus had told me that before, Jesus liked Devil's Claw. I tended to take Valerian because you got a noticable rattle from it, I was still a bit of a fiend, wheras Devil's Claw was more subtle. Jesus said Devil's Claw was the good one and was good for my brain. I noticed that my mind was clear with Devil's Claw. Jesus told me my liver was clean and that Devil's Claw was good for my brain. Jesus also said Devil's Claw was good for my heart.
Jesus agreed with me that Milk Thistle was a good one and was good for people in psychiatric wards, but he pointed out that Devil's Claw was even better.
The primary purpose of psychiatric care in the NHS was not to make the patients better. Making the patients better was a purpose but it was secondary. The primary purpose was to make a lot of money for a few people like Donald Rumsfeld. Donald Rumsfeld was not corrupt in this. He was partly altruistic as although he was intent on making money, he invested in medicine because he also wanted to make people well and to help people while he was making money. There was corruption going on involving people lower down that did not involve him. Donald Rumsfeld was out of the loop. People lower down in the companies gave money to politicians and scientific medical experts to endorse their products. Though Donald Rumsfeld was a straight player in pharmecuticals, the corruption of others made him, and them, a lot of money.
Garlic was a good example of what was going on as it lowered blood pressure better than the pharmecuticals the doctors prescribed. That was known from scientific research which showed that over time it lowered the more important blood pressure more than the pharmecutical the doctors prescribed. What the scientific research did not say was that Garlic lowered blood pressure straight away. That garlic lowered blood pressure straight away was known to me. That was important, as if you feel your blood pressure soaring you should take a few cloves of garlic.
Donald Rumsfeld agreed with that if there are natural products that are better than his pharmecuticals, the doctors should prescribe the natural products even if it made him less money. Donald Rumsfeld was OK on this, there were people lower down in the companies who were not and would do everything they could, including corrupt payments of money and lying, to smear natural products and endorse their product.
I thought that psycholgists used the pendulum. I realised it was psychiatrists who used the pendulum. Maybe it was both of them. It was psychologists who used the pendulum. I would have to check on the difference between psychiatrists and psychologists. Whoever used the pendulum, they were idiots. Nobody should use a pendulum, they were extremely dangerous. They were an instrument of murder and of torture. That wasn't how they advertised them. Pendulums should be banned. That was unless you think kids should go around with knives.
I sometimes hypnitised people but it was natural and there was no pendulum or technique. It happened when I was in a trance and Jesus took over me. I didn't try to hypnotise anyone, it just sometimes happened. That was good and natural hypnotism was the only hypnotism that should be done. Nobody should try to hypnotise someone, if you find yourself hypnotising someone automatically, thats fine.
Top mathematicians were also sponging off me. That was the X = Y x Xes. It was if the Y was 1. That was something they told children in Primary School was wrong. They were wrong to tell children it was wrong. It was correct and required weightlessness which there was on a quantum level. Stephen Hawkin agreed with me. It explained how quantum particles - the word particles was deliberate and a rebuke to Stephen Hawkin - appeared in different places at the same time. I thought they didn't want to admit that one because it was so simple and it came from me.
X = Y x Xes was a big one. Einstien had looked for that and hadn't been able to find it.
People thought it couldn't be the answer to why quantum particles appeared in different places at the same time, because it was so simple and Primary School. It was that. The boffins wanted a 10 page equation to answer it and didn't check what they had been taught at Primary School as they took what they had been taught at Primary School for granted.
A mystery that remained was gravity. I had solved why quantum particles sometimes appeared in different places at the same time, I thought gravity would be left to them. Maybe gravity would be solved by me. It would be solved by me as I was walking along the street in a trance, I would have to remember this and the mystery of gravity would be solved by me. It was obviously to do with electricity. It was the pull of an electrical current. It was positive ions attracting negative ions. People thought it couldn't be because positive repelled positive and negative repelled negative. The vibe of them was smarty and wrong. It was true positive repelled positive and negative repelled negative, it just meant that the attraction of positive and negative was stronger than the repulsion. Stephen Hawkin agreed with me. I was puzzled that it was a mystery. I wondered if it was something they knew but had not been able to prove. I thought it was something they should be able to prove.
I thought they must have done experiments with magnetism. They had. The problem was a laboratory was so small that the difference was so many decimal places away that it did not show. Even when they took big magnets out of a laboratory, it was too small. The earth was so big that the difference did show and was known as gravity. It explained why a larger object with greater mass, like the earth, had more gravity than a smaller object with less mass, like the moon.
Although Stephen Hawkin had agreed with me, it did not come from him, it came from me. Stephen Hawkin had thought down that line and thought it a likely explanation but he did not say it because it was too simple and he did not want to be embarassed by saying something simple that the others did not agree with, so he discarded it and went onto something else. Stephen Hawkin prefered complicated equations. As he did not want to explain something simple for fear of ridicule incase he was wrong, Stephen Hawkin was not as bold as me.
There was something else that explained gravity that was only known by me - other than by God and Jesus - and the information came via me. Gravity was the pull of the positive ions. The pull from positive ions was stronger than the pull from negative, and stronger than the repulsion. With a large positively charged object and a small negatively charged object, the pull was greater than with a similarly large negatively charged object and a similarly small positively charged object.
In a large object like the earth, the negative ions were busy and the pull came from the positive ions, which attracted the electrons in smaller objects like me. I could prove it was the protons of the earth that attracted my electrons, as my electrons were to my feet. If they checked, they would find more protons to my head and more electrons to my feet. That was an exageration but it did convey a truth. It was my electrons that were attracted to the ground.
I was amazed that gravity was a mystery to scientists. It was no mystery to me.
There was an experiment the scientists could do to prove me correct. They could drop a positively charged object from a high altitude and drop a negatively charged object of the same size and weight from the same height. If I was correct, the negatively charged object would hit the ground first.
I thought that was an experiment they must have done. Everybody thought they must have done it. If they had not done it, the boffins were negligent. Stephen Hawkin told me they had done it and they hit the ground at the same time. From the way he told me it appeared he was being sneaky and lying to try to throw me off because it was embarasing for them. They had not done that experiment and they had been negligent. The experiment was too simple for them so they discarded it and hadn't bothered with it. They wanted a 15 page equation to explain gravity rather than something simple. They had been negligent and not done that experiment, if they did it they could find the negatively charged object hit the ground first, they had not done the experiment, Stephen Hawkin had lied to cover up for them and the truth was with me.
Jesus pointed out that they could have a 5 page equation for gravity if they followed me. Jesus said I was correct in my explanation of gravity and that if the scientists followed me they could encapsulate it in a 5 page equation that would explain it.
By explaining both unexplained quantum phenomena and answering the mystery of gravity simply and correctly, I had made fools of the boffins. Some people thought I could not possibly be correct even though they thought I made sence, because what I was saying was so simple, and they didn't believe the boffins could have missed it, so they thought the boffins must have previously taken a look at those and proved them wrong. Their assumption was wrong. The boffins were good at complex equations - I couldn't do those equations and the boffins were very clever at them - but were no good at simple things. That they were no good at simple things meant they lacked common sence.
I was aware I had disagreed with Jesus about the transcript of the hypnotism. I accepted that Jesus must be correct but it puzzled me. Jesus thought I should get £10 000 and no transcript, I thought the other way. Jesus pointed out that the reason I wanted the transcript was I was after revenge and wanted to rub their noses in it. That was correct, I was more interested in revenge than cash. Also, by smashing them and making an example of them I was protecting people other than me.


Jesus pointed out to me that the bit about her affair was important and to make sure to write it.
The scripture called her a prostitute. Some people thought she was a prostitute because she was working as a nurse for the NHS and hypnotised people for MI5. Those people were just using the NHS and she hypnotised them for MI5. I was aware that was a danger of having government involved in healthcare. I agreed that did make her a prostitute.
That she was a prostitute was understood by me and explained by me.
Under hypnosis I could hear what I was saying, it was like I was seperate from my voice. It was the same as the incident in the doctors waiting room a week before, which I remembered after hypnosis, the words were being spoken through me and I was observing.
That had also happened at Tottenham Court Road after the guy hit me, I was attacked in the street and destroyed the guy's brain, Jesus was speaking through me and also doing paranormal things to the guy, making him weak and making him stand, exerting total control over him and others there too, it looked like a play that we had practiced, that was last year but after the hypnosis, and nobody had hypnotised me there. I didn't know what had went on, what was vision and what was real.
That I destroyed his brain was temporary. I was aware at the time I had done something in his brain when I started laughing when he hit me. Some boxers put on laughing but my laughter was unavoidable and genuine. There were 2 reasons I was laughing. One was I had said, "Peace and love to you, you need to calm down," and he had hit me, that was the main one as I found it funny that I said, "Peace and love to you," and he hit me. The other was I knew he had had hit me with his best shot and that he had no chance in a punch up with me. He took a full swing, hit me as hard as he could, it hit me in the eye and I didn't even blink. I didn't get a black eye or even a partial black eye. I had a little scratch on the nose that looked like a cat had scratched me. I was quite pleased with my reaction, or lack of. There was no flinch or head movement from me and I didn't blink. He might as well have not hit me. Some people thought I could have got out the way. I could have got out the way, I saw the punch coming and decided not to get out the way. I thought, "Thats for me, I'll take that."
When he saw me laughing he was trying to hit me again but his girfriend was holding him back. I wasn't into fighting him at that point as I was too busy laughing and it is difficult to hit someone if you are laughing and not angry. I went to walk away as I didn't want a fight in central London involving me, I was aware if I beat him up it would look like a racist attack and people might attack me, and I didn't know the state of play between the NHS and me and therefor did not want to see the police. As I went to walk away my clan came over me from a few hundred years back and said to me, "He hit you - waste him!" Therefor I stopped walking away and put my bag down and I now felt angry that he had hit me and I was up for wasting him. (that paragraph should be later on)
I knew I would beat him as his punch had no power wheras a punch from me had power. I was aware he might pull a knife on me. I knew what to do if he did that. If he pulled a knife on me from a distance away I would kick him in the balls or Roy Keene his knee. If he pulled a knife from close proximity, that was unpleasant as I'd have to take out his eye. He'd have to go into his jacket and if saw him going to his jacket that I would do his eye. I was alert to it and would have got him before he got me, which meant he wouldn't have got me. I didn't like that but I would do if someone pulled a knife at close proximity. It didn't appeal to me. I'd have to think of another one. The throat was better. It was more appealing to me as going for the eye was a bit gory. If someone went to pull a knife on me at close proximity I would hit his windpipe. If you hit someone in the windpipe the knife is no longer coming for you. A karate chop or a punch, not a knuckle one, the other one that kindergarden children do, or a few fingers would do.
People needed to know what to do if someone pulled a knife. Too many people backed off when being attacked by a knife. Roy Keene at the kneecap was the best thing to do if someone pulled a knife. Jesus agreed with me pointing out to people what to do if someone pulled a knife.
The situation between me and the guy was a side issue. The real issue was the 3 guys. There was a conspiracy of the Spirit which I was aware of but didn't involve me. As I was standing on the north east of the junction, I could see the 3 guys walking along Oxford Street, and the guy having an altercation with his girlfriend. I was aware that if I intervened and said anything, the guy would hit me. It was like a Mafia style set up with the altercation between me and the guy being a set up for the real issue which was The Spirit wanted a chat with the 3 guys. It was like in The Godfather book with the diversion for the shooting of Sonny, but it wasn't controlled by me. I was aware of it but it was controlled by The Spirit.
I was aware as I saw the 3 guys that it was like the car crash in Turkey. One was an MI5 agent, one was a major criminal and the other was a banker. Those 3 didn't want to be seen together but they were going to be seen on CCTV due to the forthcoming incident involving me. I would have intervened anyway, I was just aware it was a fortuitous circumstance.
I was aware I had done something in his brain with goblins. I was aware I had goblins persuing him down the street and that that was like I had read on the myspace page of the band Sectioned. I thought it was quite likely he had been sectioned due to meeting me. I ripped the piss right out of him. My favourite bit was where I told him to stand still and said, "You don't like people disrespecting you, do you?" He indicated no. I said, "You would attack someone who disrespected you?" He agreed. I told him, "I'll disrespect you, you're a f*cking prick."

Did Jesus say anything about the Catholic Church & other religion's crimes?

(continued)

Some people thought I had said that because there was an audience there to protect me. On the contrary, I had initially been wary to hit him as anyone who saw me beating him up would think it was a racist attack and jump in against me. I had to explain to them what had happened - that him and his girlfriend had been having a violent altercation and it appeared to me he was likely about to hit her, so I said to them, "Peace and love to you, you need to calm down," and he immediately hit me. I told the audience that he had attacked me and he wanted to fight me and I wanted to fight him, and that if anyone jumped in for me I would consider it a disgrace. I made them agree that they wouldn't join in for me. I also told the Italian guy that that if he tried to intervene on either side or try to break it up, I would hit him. I told the audience that if that happened they were to leave me to do the 2 of them and not join in for me. I told the Italian guy and the guy who attacked me's girlfriend to let him through. I also told them that if they didn't let him through to me he would later stab someone and they would be to blame for not letting him through to me.
I told him to pull the knife on me. I told him not to pull the knife on his girfriend and the Italian guy but to pull the knife on me when he got by them. I stood back and pointed out to him I was giving him some space in which to pull the knife out. I also explained to him what I would do when he pulled the knife on me. I wanted him to pull the knife on me. I explained to the audience that I wanted him to pull the knife on me and that it was pre-meditated murder in self defence and that I would get off if I was charged. Pre-meditated murder in self defence was something you were allowed to do if someone pulled a knife on you.
I had recollection of hypnotising the 3 guys. They appeared later after the guy had hit me and were walking toward me and I was doing things with arm movement and was smiling at them. I was aware the arm movement was hypnotising them. I wasn't doing it deliberately, I was just observing myself doing it. Everybody there had been hypnotised by me.
I didn't know exactly what had happened and what had not, but I knew some. There was a time when I was speaking to the audience where I was aware that the words I was hearing were not the words I was speaking, and that Jesus was speaking to them through me but it was not being revealed to me.
The incident at Tottenham Court Road suggested to me that the event in the doctors waiting room a week before I was hypnotised, which I did not recall until after I had been hypnotised, had actually happened. If it was not for the event at Tottenham Court Road, I would have believed the event in the doctor's waiting room had not happened but was the hypnosis. The event at Tottenham Court Road indicated that either the event in the doctor's waiting room had happened, or reality was mimicking the false memory.
Another aspect that was the same was one of the 3 guys was obscured to me in the same way that the guy in the doctors waiting room was obscured to me when I walked in.
Another possibility was that both events had basically happened and further detail was added in vision, perfect vision exactly replicating reality, the extra vision detail being helpful to me. There was extra detail added to the doctor's waiting room incident and I had recollection, in one of the lines, of the woman who hypnotised me telling me to add further detail on to the real event to confuse me. I chose to go along with it to make it more interesting as I was aware the detail I would chose would be good.
It was possible the actual events of both in the doctor's waiting room and Tottenham Court Road happened exactly as I recalled, the only addition being certain awarenesses. Those would be when I was paranormally adding words to the video while staring at the CCTV in the doctors waiting room, I thought that memory had been added by the NHS in the track when the woman told me to recall other events to mix in with what had actually happened, in order to confuse me; and when the sky opened up for me at Tottenham Court Road. That was not an awareness as the sky did open up for me. The night sky was blue and clear and opened up like I was travelling through. There were people amazed, I had pointed for them to look up and some of them did and they were amazed. It was possible they were amazed at me. They were amazed at me. Either the sky opened up and they were amazed or it was a false memory. I had explained to them, immediately following the sky opening up, that it hadn't actually happened but the reason they saw it was hypnotism as they had been hypnotised by Jesus through me.
What happened at Tottenham Court Road was psychedelic. I wasn't sure what had happened as there were different possible explanations, but whatever it was it was psychedelic.
Some people didn't like that I had written 'psychedelic' on my myspace music page. Jesus had told me to write psychedelic there. Music from dreams, like The Genius Bar, was psychedelic.
Music I wrote with a pen while smoking dope and led by vision was psychedelic. Smoking dope was not psychedelic and didn't give psychedelic music. Vision that led me while writing music was Spirit and was psychedelic. I wrote music led by vision also when not smoking dope, the vision had nothing to do with the dope. However, it seemed to me that when I was using a pen and led by vision, the music was better when I was smoking dope. That was because feeling comes across in music. The piano section to The Reaper was led by vision when I was straight and that was good. There was another section to that which I'd written led by vision and straight. The part I'd written stoned that had the singing with it was thrown away as it was rubbish in comparison to the parts I'd written straight. The Reaper was a top one. The Spirit pointed out I generally wrote better stoned. The Spirit liked me smoking dope while writing songs. The Spirit pointed out to other musicians who smoked dope to be like me as I only smoked when I was writing, so I only smoked occassionally. I'd smoked less in the past year than I use to smoke in a day. Because I didn't smoke much and only when I was writing, when I did I was heavily stoned on just a little. My music was further out than people who took lots of drugs every day as they were use to it. When I smoked and wrote music I was more stoned than them, and because each time I hadn't smoked for some time, each time it was like being stoned for the first time. Hence I was generally better at writing stoned music than them.
I noticed I was still walking west along Oxford Street, past Bond Street. It was Wednesday. I was puzzled as I thought it was Tuesday night. Jesus told me it was Wednesday. I was puzzled as it could not be a Wednesday because I had not worked on the past few Wednesdays and was sure I was not in Central London on Wednesday. That it was Wednesday could be figurative as good, meaning the vision was good. Jesus was born on a Wednesday. Jesus agreed he was born on Wednesday and the vision was a good one. I wondered if I was having this vision on Thursday. It wasn't. It was Wednesday. I thought the authorities would have CCTV footage and would be able to see walking along Oxford Street having the vision, they would see I was having the vision and would be able to know when it was. I didn't know what day it was in the vision. The initial part with the verses from Revelation which I was to write down on The Sun forum was Tuesday evening. The vision had continued on Wednesday as I was walking along thinking about the vision of the verses I was to write on Tuesday. It was difficult for me to pin down when it was I had this vision and I didn't know what day it was I was walking along Oxford Street having the vision. I didn't even know if I was walking along Oxford Street, I could be walking along another street completely gone while I was walking along Oxford Street in the vision. I knew I was awake in this one and in Central London and walking. I literally was walking along Oxford Street while having this vision.
I had dreams that told me to smoke some weed and write some music. They were good and were not reflections of me. I didn't want to smoke dope as it was a hassle for me. The dreams encouraged me to smoke dope, particularly the purple bud, because it was good for me and good for me to write some good music. The dreams particularly liked the purple bud. I'd written 'Up To Them' on that. 'Up To Them' was a good one. People would like that. The dreams didn't want me to smoke heavily or all the time, but occassionally while writing music. The Spirit said it was good for me to have a good new piece of music and worth the hassle for me of smoking it. I agreed with that.
There was one I was going to write called The Widow. I knew someone who was a widow. Jesus strongly pointed out to people that The Widow was not about her but was about Daisy. Jesus pointed out to people that the dead husband was me as I was so far gone in the head that I was so far away from her she was the widow. The meaning of the line 'wake me up for the dawn' was known to me. There were other lyrics like 'sorry for all I did wrong' and 'love you for ever and more' which would be understandable to everyone but 'wake me up for the dawn' was understood by me. Jesus told me The Widow was a good one. I hadn't written that yet. The music in part of it would be similar to The Widow Song by Robert Calvert. It wouldn't be the same and was written by me but in part would deliberately reflect it. It wouldn't be deliberate by me but would be deliberate by Jesus. As I was writting the music, he would guide me from where I wanted to take the music to where I didn't want to go as it sounded like The Widow Song. I would not remember this part of the vision until after I had written The Widow, and the writting of it would happen exactly as in the vision, with Jesus leading me away from where I wanted to take the music, to notes where I hadn't played which he would show me was where he wanted it to go, where I wouldn't want to go because I would notice it sounded like The Widow Song. Jesus pointed to out to people that The Widow was written by me. It was part of the music that was like The Widow Song and it was not the same, it was just a reflection which was deliberate by Jesus. The Widow was the other half of The Widow Song as in the other half of the story. The Widow Song was sung be a woman about her dead husband who was a star fighting man, and had presumably died in space. The Widow was sung from the view of the husband dead in bed beside her.
Jesus was in favour of me smoking dope occassionally. Jesus pointed out he did not like people smoking dope heavily and every day, but that is was good for people to smoke a little bit occassionally, like once every few weeks. Jesus pointed out that the weed was there to be smoked and it was good for people to smoke a little bit once every few weeks and to listen to me, but it was not good for people to smoke it every day. Jesus thought it was good for everyone of adult age to smoke a little bit every few weeks, other than people who didn't want to. Jesus pointed out that if people didn't smoke tobacco, a little bit of tobacco with the dope every few weeks would not harm them. Jesus said if health conscious people didn't want to smoke at all they could sprinkle a little bit on their salad. Jesus pointed out it was good for brain to smoke a little bit now and again but it was bad for the brain to smoke it every day.
I thought it wasn't the LSD that destroyed people, but the LSD enabled society and shrinks to destroy them. But it happened via LSD and it wasn't good to enable society and shrinks to destroy people. LSD was dangerous as if certain people in society found out you had been taking it you could be in serious danger. With some people, if their family found out they might tell the doctors and the doctors might destroy the person. It wasn't worth buying LSD even if you thought it was good for you, as by buying it you encouraged the trade in it and it destroyed people.
LSD could be good for gaining info and for thinking. There were better ways of gaining info, like watching dreams. Freud is highly dangerous and could destroy people. People had to know that dreams are Spirit like in Joel 2. Studying dreams got you thinking. Dreams are a better source of info than LSD. That was aside from any consideration of LSD destroying people.
Jesus pointed out that LSD itself did destroy some people, but he agreed that with people who took LSD, while LSD by itself did destroy some, it was mainly society that destroyed them.
Some people thought I saw visions because of all the LSD I use to take when I was around 20. I wasn't buying that. I didn't see visions around the time when I took LSD and wasn't on LSD, and didn't see visions for years after. On LSD you don't see proper visions. Being crucified with Jesus on a cross out in space was the best vision on LSD for me. Being crucified with Jesus on a cross out in space was a recurring one for me. It was on the same cross in space with him merged into me. It was recurring as I'd be getting jip from the devil, like the devil playing the flute through me when the band I was in was jamming. I'd be praying to God and Jesus constantly, I could pray while still playing the flute, when I was tripping it was often like the flute played itself. My prayer was 'God be here' over and over like a mantra, constantly for hours when I was tripping and often when I wasn't tripping. Jesus pointed out I did that a lot and he liked that when I wasn't tripping. When I was tripping and the devil was attacking and trying to take me over, my prayer would be answered by God and Jesus would come and I'd end up crucified with Jesus on the cross out in space. I liked being crucified with Jesus on a cross out in space. That meant I was safe and the trip was always good from then on. I always found it was early on the devil would attack but then Jesus would come and the trip was good from then on. That was on the microdots. I was a religious battleground on those. That was when I was 19. It was the end of when I was 18 and mainly when I was 19. There were a few batches of microdots when I was 19. I liked those. The microdots were generaly stronger than the blotters. I found the microdots were good for thinking and better for thinking than the blotters. Even when the blotters were strong or stronger than the microdots they were not as good for thinking. I found the microdots more enjoyable than the blotters. I was of the understanding that the microdots were ergot, which was the natural LSD and a completely different compound from the blotters which were chemical LSD. I thought it was wrong that both of them were called LSD. I noticed that after the microdots I didn't feel drained wheras after the blotters I felt drained. That was not that I took the microdots before the blotters, it was the other way round. I had been taking loads of blotters and was drained by them, when the microdots appeared. I thought the ergot should be legal.
I thought Hawkwind's Space Bandits album came from the ergot. It was the right time and it sounded like them. Brock's guitar playing on Images, and the rest of the track, and Black Elk Speaks sounded like ergot. It sounded like ergot from Images to Realms.
Jesus liked Black Elk Speaks and liked what Hawkwind had added on.
Generally on LSD, the blotters, if it is strong you see swirling patterns and distortion. You do see things, usually fast changing and random, but it had no meaning. What was seen on LSD should not be called visions. Being crucified with Jesus on a cross out in space was a vision for me but that was a vision for me and was Jesus saving me from when I was being attacked by the devil. The attack was the devil was coming through me by putting thoughts in my brain and playing my flute. That was on the microdots. I didn't recall seeing anything of value. When I took that blotter that was way too strong, there was interesting things like running down Oxford Street in a James Bond movie while simultaniously being the Eternal Champion from the Michael Moorcock books, but there was nothing of any value. I got those acid withdrawn. They were like 3 tabs. That was not an estimate from me. Two years before that, I had dreamed about that trip. In the dream the acid I would take in 2 years time that was way too strong was equivelent to 3 strong tabs. In that dream I saw myself on the trip as James Bond running along Oxford Street in the road with cars swerving out the way. That was in the dream about the moons. I had been intending to add that on the the dream about the moons on The Sun forum. I wondered if I had added that on. I had been meaning to add it on. The other bit that needed to be added on was that Spaced Out Al had not influenced me and that I was tripping heavily before he came along. I had wanted to take lots of acid since I read about it in a medical journal when I was 13. The one who was most into acid and was influencing people to take it when I was 18 was me. Spaced Out Al was pleased to meet me.
I knew the main dealer the acid that were too strong came through. He had thousands of them. After I had that trip I told him they were way too strong and to withdraw them as people would be sectioned and there would be a lot of cops with them. I told him to try a quarter of one. He tried a quarter and w

Rederic, I didn't answer your question as it is answered in a vision I haven't yet written on this forum.

(continued)

Visions on LSD did not have such clarity or detail. The one where I was crucified with Jesus on a cross out in space did have clarity but it could be written in one sentence and I would have had my eyes closed. With LSD you saw things with your eyes closed but if your eyes were open it was just distortion of normal view.
It was 20 years after the LSD that I was seeing visions every day. They weren't always big visions, they were often mundane like Jesus would tell me what side of the street wo walk on. Sometimes I'd find £10. Twice Jesus had told me to walk from Oxford Circus to Tottenham Court Road on the left side of the road so the spooks would see me.
I noticed the vision had gone from the book of Revelation to LSD. Hawkwind had also appeared. Jesus pointed out to me that I had taken a lot of LSD when I was young and that I liked Hawkwind so it was normal for LSD and Hawkwind to be in a vision involving me. Jesus pointed out that the vision was also about me so it was OK that they were in. The vision would later go back to the bible and about the Spirit but at the moment it was Hawkwind and LSD. Jesus pointed out I was to also write the section about Hawkwind and LSD as it was about me and Jesus also wanted to point out about Huw and Waiting For Tomorrow.
Jesus' favourite Hawkwind was from 1983 - 1989. That was nearly the same as me but not quite. I liked Sonic Attack and Levitation. Jesus wasn't keen on them and his favourite Hawkwind was 1983 - 1989. Jesus prefered Hawkwind 1983 - 1989 to Hawkwind in the 70s as he thought Hawkwind in the 70s were a bit hippy and he prefered the metal sound with the electric guitars. Jesus liked Dave and Huw both playing guitars. Jesus liked the keyboard tracks too during that time but he particularly liked the guitars.
Jesus' favourite Hawkwind album was Out & Intake. That surprised me. It was a good album, it wasn't my favourite but it was in my top 3. There was good stuff on that album. Jesus pointed out that Out & Intake was his favourite Hawkwind album out of all Hawkwind albums and he said people should get it. I was surprised. It was good, I liked Turner Point. Jesus smiled and pointed out to people that Turner Point was for me and for people like me. Jesus liked the Huw. He liked Turner Point but he particularly liked Huw's songs. Jesus told me he liked Waiting For Tomorrow and Solitary Mind Games, particularly Waiting For Tomorrow. Those were songs written by Huw Lloyd Langdon. Huw also wrote 5/4 with Harvey, Jesus pointed out that was very good musically but prefered the other 2. I liked those but I prefered Turner Point and Ejection. Jesus agreed with me that Ejection was good but he pointed out it was Dave Brock's performance that was very good and that it was Dave Brock's performance of Ejection that made that song good, rather than the song. Jesus said he prefered Huw's songs. Jesus said that out of all of Hawkwind songs, not just on that album but all of them, his favourite Hawkind song was Waiting For Tomorrow. Jesus pointed out he prefered the version on Out & Intake, and he also prefered the version of Solitary Mind Games on Out & Intake. Those were also on Choose Your Masques but I agreed with Jesus they were better on Out & Intake. Jesus told people not to get Choose Your Masques to listen to Waiting For Tomorrow, but to get Out & Intake as that was fair on Huw. Jesus pointed out the guitar sound was better on the version on Out & Intake, and the sound in general was better, and the synth effects were better. Jesus' favourite member of Hawkwind was Huw. He liked the others too but Huw was his favourite.
Jesus was pleased with Huw for Waiting For Tomorrow. Jesus told me he had given Huw a vision and Huw had put it in the song. I thought that would be part of the song, for example the chorus not being in the vision. Jesus said he had given Huw a vision and Huw had put it in part of the song and he was pleased with Huw. There were parts from the bible in that song, like the moon turning red:

'Moons turning red, trees are dead
I wonder what this means'

Also:

'Stars are fading from the sky
Tell me could this be a dream'

The best was the 2nd verse:

I knew there were stars falling from the sky in Revelation. I wasn't sure if there were stars fading from the sky in the bible. It was possible Huw had also seen that. I had wondered if the song was a dream. The part that was vision, other than the pilots and perhaps some other bits like the sheets of mist, and not in the bible known to me was 'clouds forming into swords'. Huw pointed out to me 'words written in the sky'. I was aware of that and of the sky rolling up like a scroll in Revelation which may or may not explain, Huw said it didn't, it was seperate and he had seen that. We'd come back to 'words written in the sky' later and examine it. For now we'd look at 'clouds forming into swords'. That was in the 2nd verse, so was 'words written in the sky':

'Words written in the sky
I wonder what this means
Clouds forming into swords
Shining like I've never seen'

That was top notch. Jesus and me were in Grosvenor Square looking in amazement at those words in the air. Michael Moorcock couldn't have written as well as that. Michael Moorcock shook his head pointing out he could not have written that unless God had shown him. The words weren't in the sky, they were in the air. 'Words written in the sky' meant scripture, the sky was figurative for heaven, words in heaven was scripture. 'Clouds forming into swords' was the wrath of God via rain. The words were amazing, me and Jesus were amazed, and I wondered if that verse was scripture. The words were up in the air in Grosvenor Square. Jesus pointed out they were not scripture as they were not in the sky. They were quite high in the air. Jesus supposed as the words were seen in the air that was a little one, a little prophecy, and was a little bit of scripture. The words were now in the sky over Grosvenor Square. That wasn't quite accurate, the words were seen in the sky from Grosvenor Square but were a bit bit to the west. Jesus told me they were in the sky over Grosvenor Square, and he moved the words east so the words were in the sky above the American Embassy.
Huw pointed out to me that 'clouds forming into swords' was in the 1st verse and 'words written in the sky' was in the 2st verse. Jesus and me had seen them together and the words me and Jesus saw that were from 2 seperate verses of Huws' song and put together, was new prophecy from Jesus. That was for the UK. It was for the UK and for the American Embassy.
'Clouds have changed to sheets of mist' was an important line of the prophecy of the song. That was linked to the clouds having previously been swords. I thought it would be easy for someone to see clouds as swords in a vision or dream. I could see clouds as swords. I could see there were about 25 of them. They looked like daggers. There were 15. I couldn't see the street, all I could see was the screen of the vision, which was the sky infront of me, up and down, and there were 15 dagger clouds in the distance. They weren't shining but were dirty full of rain. They were close together. I saw into one of the clouds it was Tewksbury. That was the town that had been flooded before. It was flooded again. I looked into the dagger cloud close beside that on and it was also Tewksbury.
That the clouds were Tewksbury was figurative and meant flood. I saw a big dagger close was Cockermouth. I wouldn't remember Cockermouth until after it had happened. I would be writing this vision before Cockermouth, then when the Cockermouth happened I would remember it was in the vision. I was worried that people wouldn't believe me that Cockermouth was in the vision. I would have written the lyrics from Huw and about the flood daggers, before the flood - some people would see that had been written before - and would edit the name Cockermouth in after the flood as I would only remember that after. Some people would believe me.
I had seen 25 dagger clouds and then I had seen 15. It was 15. The 25 was an approximation from me when I first saw them and not clearly. There were 15 close together. They were in the distance so it was not immediately but they were in view so it was soon.
I saw on the screen that took up my entire vision so I couldn't see the street or anything else, clouds as sheets of mist. There were 3. It was 2. It was 2 but it may have been 3 but I certainly saw 2. They were shining. There was clear sky, a lot of clear sky, around the shining sheets of mist and the sky was also shining. The dagger clouds had not been shining but the sheets of mist were shining. The shining sheets of mist and shining clear sky was good news for Huw and good news for me. It was good news for Huw as it meant things were getting better for him. I was glad to hear that as I knew Huw was in hospital with kidney failure. I had read that on the Hawkwind myspace and that he had kidney failure from food poisoning and was having dialasis. I wondered if the food poisoning was the wrong type of mushroom. I didn't know what dialasis was but I assumed he was attached to a machine. I was glad things were looking up for Huw. Huw pointed out that the shining sheets of mist and shining clear sky was for him and there was one big blanket sheet of mist for me. Huw told me the shining sheets of mist and clear sky was for me, and the one big blanket sheet of mist was what the NHS wanted for me.

(section missing

Huw wanted me to write the lyrics of Waiting For Tomorrow in their entirity for people to see. Jesus agreed that I should write the lyrics for Huw, and for people to read, at this point:

Moon streaming through the trees
I wonder what this means
Clouds forming into swords
Shining like I've never seen

(chorus)
Waiting for tomorrow
Hiding from tomorrow
Waiting for tomorrow
Run from all our sorrow

Words written in the sky
Tell me could this be a dream?
Silently pilots are circling
Waiting for the unforseen
Red alert goes through the world
The heavens are opening
Run to the shelter nearest you
Our planets running out of steam

(chorus)

Moon turning red, trees are dead
I wonder what this means
Clouds have changed to sheets of mist
Like I've never seen

(chorus)

Stars are fading from the sky
Tell me could this be a dream
Silently pilots land
Waiting for the unforseen



We were on the street of the north side of Grosvenor Square walking west. I was surprised I was there, I thought I was walking around Oxford Street, my legs must have taken a detour. I was aware a friend had taken me to Grosvenor Square. The only person I was with was Jesus, I hadn't met anyone, it was Jesus who had taken me to Grosvenor Square. I thought perhaps Jesus had taken me there in the vision but in physical person I was elsewhere. I didn't know where I was but I could see I was in Grosvenor Square. But I was in a vision state seeing words in the air and Grosvenor Square had a vision like quality. I thought I was somewhere between Tottenham Court Road and Oxford Street, that was dark for me and I wasn't there. Grosvenor Square was light for me and I was there.

(will continue and add in)

(continued, its a work in progress)

I didn't know whether Huw had seen 'clouds forming into swords' but it was superb. 'The heavens are opening' could be rain. Kelvin McKenzie agreed with me that line could be rain. I noticed he was being friendly to me. I thought Huw had seen 'clouds forming into swords' as it was so good, or Jesus had told him to write that. Sometimes Jesus told me a line when I was writing a song. Jesus agreed that 'clouds forming into swords' was good. The way Jesus said that a bit smug seemed to me that Jesus had shown it to Huw, or he wanted me to think he had as he wanted the credit for it. John who wrote Revelation liked it. Jeremiah, Isaiah and Exekiel liked it. Of those 3, Isaiah liked it the most and Exekiel the least. Isaiah was cool. He was the top Old Testament prophet. Isaiah liked Huw and liked me. Exekiel didn't like Huw becuase he use to be in Hawkwind and Exekiel didn't like me because I use to take LSD and occassionally smoked dope. Exekiel was a stickler who was still into the old religious law. Exekiel respected me as he knew I was going about things the right way - he knew I liked Exekiel 13 - and that God was with me, and that Jesus was the Messiah and that Jesus was with me, but he didn't like me.
The feeling was mutual. I respected Exekiel but I didn't like him. I particularly liked Isaiah and I liked Jeremiah but I wasn't keen on Exekiel, though I respected him and acknowledged God spoke through him.
Isaiah spoke against sacrifices, comparing one who sacrificed a bull to one who broke a dog's back. In Exekiel's temple at the end of Exekiel, there was sacrificing of bulls. I was to write passages to compare the 2:

"This is the one I esteem:
he who is humble and contrite in spirit,
and trembles at my word.
But whoever sacrifices a bull
is like one who kills a man,
and whoever offers a lamb,
like one who break's a dog's neck" (Isaiah 66:2-3)

"This is what the Soveriegn LORD says: In the first month on the first day you are to take a young bull without defect and purify the sanctuary." (Exekiel 45:18)

People might be puzzled at the contradiction between them if God spoke through both of them. I knew the answer to that. God did speak through both of them in visions and the visions also reflected the character of the men. God spoke through visions seen by me and those visions also reflected the character of me. In character Isaiah liked being free and was facing toward the Messiah, wheras Exekiel was into self flagelation and sacrificing bulls and was facing toward the temple. Hence God expressed freedom through Isaiah and self flagelation and sacrificing bulls through Exekiel. You could choose between them. He spoke through both of them while revealing the characted of the men. I thought Isaiah was the better man and was higher in God. Jesus agreed.
Isaiah was like me. If God had told Isaiah to lay on his side for 390 days, Isaiah would have immediately said, "No, give me another one." Isaiah nodded to me that he wouldn't have lay on his side for 390 days and he would have told God to give him another one.
You were allowed to say, "No" to God. Exekiel said "No" to God when God told him to cook his food using human excrement for fuel during the time of laying on his side. God accepted Exekiel saying "No" and therefor told Exekiel to use cow dung instead. Isaiah pointed out to me he wouldn't have done that one at all and would have said "No" to laying on his side for 390 days.
God gave people instructions in keeping with their character. There was no point telling Isaiah to lay on his side for 390 days, but He could tell Exekiel to do that.
Isaiah told me that if God told him to sit around smoking dope and to write prophecy for people to read he would do that. Isaiah pointed out that that was prophecy from God and had nothing to do with the dope, the dope being seperate from the prophecy. Isaiah told me that if God told him to sit around smoking dope he would do it.
I was aware it was possible God could tell some people to sit around smoking dope. I was aware that if God did tell people to sit around smoking dope it would just be a few people, God agreed that it would just be a few and that one of them was me, though I was aware many might claim that God had told them to do that. I was aware that God might tell someone or a few people to sit around smoking dope as a sign to the Gentiles. God might tell someone or a few people to sit around smoking dope as a sign to the Jews. Or God might tell someone or a few to sit around smoking dope as a sign to the Gentiles and the Jews.
God had told me I was to sit around smoking dope. God had appeared to me as an old man with short hair and no beard. He had appeared to me in different forms before, sometimes as Spirit. I liked when he appeared to me in Spirit form. The NHS wanted me to tell Him "No". I didn't want to sit around smoking dope every day as it wasn't good for me. The reason it wasn't good for me was it made me lazy. It was good for me to smoke hash occassionally and write some music. God agreed with me and God pointed out to them it was good for me, and told me to point out it was good for me and to tell them about hash and the music industry and ask them what sort of music they wanted.
People who thought hash should be illegal had to ask themselves what kind of music they liked and envisaged themselves listening to. They had to imagine the music scene without The Beatles, The Rolling Stones and Abba. People might think that The Beatles, The Rolling Stones and Abba would have had songs just the same with no hash. They wouldn't have. People had raised this question before about the music industry but it was good coming from me. People respected me and I was also raising Abba. People knew The Beatles and The Rolling Stones were smoking hash but they didn't realise about Abba. If Abba had been smoking spliffs while writing music, the anti marijuana brigade could pack up and go home.
I wondered if Abba had been smoking spliffs while writing music. They had. The guys in Abba nodded to me that they were smoking spliffs while writing songs. It was obvious. Anyone who thought Dancing Queen was written straight was in cloud cuckoo land. Benni pointed out to me that they had some really good green when Dancing Queen was written. It was the other one who was the main one, that was Bjorn. I saw Bjorn was writing music in a cloud of marijuana smoke.
It was possible Waterloo could have been written straight. Dancing Queen could not have been written straight. Dancing Queen was not the only spliff song by Abba. There were quite a few of them. Take A Chance was a spliff song.
Abba were clever hidding the spliffs so the public didn't know and thought they had written the songs straight. That was because they had a mass market and clean cut image, so they kept the spliffs hidden.
Some people thought Dancing Queen had been written on LSD. It sounded to me like it had been written on LSD. However, it wasn't written on LSD, it was written on really good green as the vision had told me.
People though it was me who was in cloud cuckoo land and that Dancing Queen had been written straight. I had said that people who thought Dancing Queen was written stright were in cloud cuckoo land but that wasn't fair as they didn't have as good an ear for music as me.
I didn't know that Bjorn was the main writter for Abba. I assumed the main was was him because of 'Bjorn Again'. It may have been that Benni was the main writter for Abba, in which case the part of the vision about Abba songs being written while stoned was wrong. However, the vision was not wrong as the vision pointed out that if Bjorn was the main songwritter, that part of the vision was correct and Abba songs were written stoned, wheras if Benni was the main songwritter the part of the vision about Abba songs being written stoned was wrong due to a reflection of an assumption by me.
I would have to check whether the main songwritter was Benni or Bjorn.
I analysed Dancing Queen. The melody of the introduction was stoned. A straight person would not play those notes but they would come to someone who was stoned. The verse could be written straight. The chorus - 'She is the dancing queen' - section could have been written straight. The next bit - 'You can dance, you can try' - was stoned. The girls in Abba agreed with me that that bit was stoned. They were aware that Bjorn was giving them stoned songs to sing. The 'you can dance' section and the introduction melody indicated to me it was written by someone who was stoned.
Just as God spoke through Exekiel and Isaiah and also revealed their characters, God spoke through Moses and also revealed the character of Moses and the ancient Israelites by giving the law to them. People thought that was something against Moses and the Israelis but it was an ancient tribe and the laws were quite liberal for the time. Moses was smiling at and pointed out that they were liberal for the time. I wondered what the tribes were doing in Britian at the time. It was likely they were not so liberal in Britian at the time. I saw in Britain at the time that cave man was stoning people in Britian at the time. I saw there was a big cave man in Britian at the time who was the main cave man and the king who was particularly brutal. Ancient Israel with the law that God gave them was more liberal than Britain at the time.

What was happening with me was what was written in Joel 2:28:

And afterwards,
I will pour my Spirit on all people.
Your sons and daughters will prophecy,
your old men will dream dreams,
your young men will see visions. (Joel 2:28)

(will continue)